To be translated.
The University of Gothenburg is in Almedalen to participate in many seminars, ours and others. As media has reported, there are fewer activities and seminars this year’s week, compared to the all-time high last year. But maybe that figure doesn´t tell us much, since this year is the third largest week in size since the start of Almedalen week 51 years ago.
For us, focus is on contributing with research, knowledge and content that can be the basis for political decisions or development in our society and the world. In the planning for our participation this week, we decided that our shared seminars would focus on some of the important issues that concern people today. Since we are a broad university, we also want to express that in the Västsvenska Arenan’s programme.
Pro-Vice-Chancellor Mattias Goksör’s and I had prepared some tactics for this week, and that was to visit a range of seminars to bring back different ideas and approaches to our work. Mattias has, for instance, visited a number of seminars covering the AI area. One of these seminars was held at Västsvenska Arenan, and can be seen on their Facebook page (in Swedish): Sweden should be best in the world to utilise AI, but how do we deal with AI ethics? During the seminar, AI was described as something that continuously are moving boundaries and pushing us forward. The seminars concerning AI has this year often pointed out the importance that directors and leaders have an understanding on how their organisations are affected by AI.
Many meetings, discussions and round table conversations are happening here in Almedalen, and it is a fantastic opportunity to listen actively to one another and to hear what others have to say. The Vice-Chancellors have a reoccurring occasion to meet at a Vice-Chancellor’s breakfast organised by UKÄ (Swedish Higher Education Authority) and SUHF (The Association of Swedish Higher Education Institutions). The big topic this year was the reports that are to be sent to the Government’s research bill, and this issue has been recurrent during many of the seminars that I have visited. We have noticed that the Government hasn’t taken the question of research infrastructure into enough consideration. Other important areas of the bill are the need for research about professional education and training, particularly for schools and prospect teachers. This was highlighted in the seminar (in Swedish) “Sweden as a Knowledge Nation – How do we strengthen the school system’s scientific foundation and the desirability to become a teacher” .
Today, University West organised the intriguing seminar “Can you say whatever you like within academia?”, where two of our employees participated as a moderator and a panellist: Ulf Dalnäs, Head of Department at HDK, and Marie Demker, Dean at the Faculty of Arts and a professor in Political Science. Martin Hellström, Vice-Chancellor at University West, and Erik J Olsson, Chair of Academic Rights Watch, also participated. The panel raised different threats and risks that the academic freedom stands before, such as how the Vice-Chancellors are appointed, and threats that affect researchers. Interesting, and maybe controversial, viewpoints were presented, and worth watching if you missed.
The Higher Education political debate in Almedalen mostly takes place at the SUHF seminars. Today, the most well-visited was a political debate about the question “Do the Swedish Higher Education need a large reorganisation?”, which was visited by our minister for higher education and research Matilda Ernkrans (S). She emphasised the need for both a short term, but also a long term, planning when it comes to the higher education institutions’ task to contribute with competence to the Swedish labour market.
Many meetings remain in Almedalen, but after that it is time for a few weeks of recuperation. I therefore take the opportunity to wish you all a pleasant and relaxing summer leave!
At a conference in Bologna this week, I participated in the 20th anniversary of the Bologna process with 170 Vice-Chancellors from 80 countries, and a number of other delegates.
Nowadays, many students or teachers don’t know that much about what occurred in 1999, when the EU ratified the Bologna declaration. The turn of the millennium was about to happen, and we had hopes (and perhaps some fears) that the approaching digitalisation would make us connected in a way we had never seen before: mobile phones, computers, the world wide web, internet banks – all seemed possible.
We may not think it’s all that extraordinary today, but in 1999, the idea of an open university system, where students could study outside their own university without having to worry that their education would not be recognised when they returned home, was not a certainty. In fact, it isn’t even so today. But in 1999, the first EU decision on shared rules and regulations was made. Sweden had some adjustments to do, but in 2007 we changed the Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees systems, and we joined the Bologna process.
In 2019, the Bologna declaration celebrates its 20th anniversary, and the Bologna system is facing a new chapter. The conference began with a ceremonial academic procession in the Vice-Chancellor’s gown (in a 35°C temperature) from Arciginnasio, the original University building, to Palazzo Re Enzo, at the Piazza Maggiore. The University of Bologna’s Vice-Chancellor Francesco Ubertini, reminded us about the student’s important role in the education system. The first Vice-Chancellors at the University of Bologna—the world’s first university—were students who were appointed by the students themselves.
At the conference, we stated that it was time to take the next step towards a more inclusive and sustainable Bologna system. The system needs to open up to a society that is digitalised, takes on the global challenges, and focus on a student-centred learning. Some of the students pointed out that: “Don’t teach where we are, teach where we will be.”
We also discussed how employability not only can be seen as the achievement of specific learning goals, but also needs to be seen as social competence, innovative thinking, ability to realise projects, language competence, and so on. A lot of common interests are included in life-long learning.
Agneta Bladh, the Government’s investigator of the internationalisation report that was completed this year, pointed out the importance of looking at the Commission’s effort on Erasmus+ and the European Universities Networks (EUN) as an expansion of the Bologna process. This involves a broader collaboration, which affects both students and employees, development of different curricula, innovation, an inclusive attitude towards the society around us, and an effort on Agenda 2030.
It seems suitable now to mention that the University of Gothenburg scooped one of the EUN projects as a member of the alliance Eutopia, the day after the Bologna process. Congratulations to all of us. We now have the opportunity to work long term for a more inclusive collaboration in education.
The Chair of the European Student’s Union, Adam Gajeks, had a interesting conclusion in Bologna: “Higher education is a Human Right.” Let’s see how we handle his, and other important ideas, in the Bologna system the upcoming 20 years.
Today, Almedalen week has started. This means interesting seminars, new knowledge, and, hopefully, many rewarding meetings for me and the many University employees that are participating.
Last week ended with a beautiful inauguration of our new professors in the Concert Hall in Gothenburg. It’s truly a privilege, dressed in the Vice-Chancellor’s gown and chain, to inaugurate our new professors. At the same time, we also highlight our pedagogical role models that have received the pedagogical prizes, and the excellent teacher award.
This year we introduced a new feature, with short films that presented the researchers in their environment and everyday life, and we got an insight in their commitment to their field. The ceremony became livelier, and to my understanding it was a much-appreciated feature. This way of renewing and reinventing traditions characterises my view of the University of Gothenburg.
A very warm thank you to all people involved in making this beautiful tradition a memorable ceremony.
(Sent to translator)
This March, SUHF started a working group for questions regarding ethics, misconduct and good research practise, which I have been appointed to chair. This is an assignment which is both enjoyable and important. Many national and international networks have research ethics on their agenda. This group will work with research ethics issues on a national level during 2019 and 2020. The members represent different skills and positions within different subjects, and represent higher education institutions of various size and focus.
At our first meeting, we started off in the importance that our attention not only be set on misconduct. Our work must spring from the “good” and focus on basic values, the freedom of research, and that we take care of the responsibility that comes with this freedom. With our autonomy as higher education institutions, we have plenty of influence and authority. At the same time, needless to say, we must follow regulations and facilitate a thorough management of deviations.
Members of the working group raised the matter that the ethics issues are utterly important for maintaining trust in our institutions, which also is a prerequisite to keep our autonomy. That is, if we don’t succeed in upholding a good research practise, we as institutions don’t deserve our autonomy. We agreed on that the working group is well-timed, when there’s so much going on in the matter. For example, we talked about the increasing number of cases of misconduct, that there are new demands on education within research ethics, and last but not least, the new bill on research misconduct: (2018/19:58) Ny ordning för att främja god sed och hantera oredlighet i forskning. This bill will have a sizeable effect on our work.
I’m cautiously positive to the new misconduct board that has been suggested. It remains to be seen how it will turn out. I wish for more uniform assessments, more efficient management, and a coherent expertise that can have an advisory and prescriptive function.
Anyway, in the working group we agreed to begin with the comparison of our institutions’ administration arrangements, and to see if we can propose a national code of ethics. This is only selection from a very exciting and important work.
I will surely return to this issue.
February brought two interesting events for the University of Gothenburg on the theme of internationalisation. In week 7, a 13-strong delegation headed off from GU to Washington and the surrounding area, while the end of the month saw the official launch of the European university network EUTOPIA in Brussels.
The aims of the trip to the US included showcasing Swedish education and research, and promoting Sweden as a knowledge and research nation. This was done over the course of three intensive days, in partnership with Uppsala, Lund, Stockholm and Umeå universities and the Swedish Embassy in Washington. We also visited our new partner universities in North Carolina and South Carolina, holding discussions and deepening our cooperation.
What do we gain from such visits? As well as the obvious – that representatives from the Faculty of Arts, the Faculty of Science, the Faculty of Social Sciences, the Sahlgrenska Academy and the School of Business, Economics and Law had the opportunity to meet their counterparts and to plan exchange agreements and collaboration – it also provided an important insight into the American context. Our many discussions helped give an understanding of the situation for American universities and what the Trump administration has meant for them. Universities in the US are expected to contribute towards economic growth, while at the same time financing is increasingly dependent on external funding and donors.
Another strength of this type of delegation – where several universities travel together, including faculty, student and management representatives – is that we can present ourselves as a united force, where Sweden as a whole, with all its competence in connection with higher education and research, has greater opportunities to achieve visibility and impact. We also broaden our horizons by being introduced to each other’s contacts.
The fact that working together makes us stronger was also shown clearly in Brussels on 28 February, when the EUTOPIA alliance was launched during a seminar where we, together with our student representatives, presented our vision of inclusive, open European university cooperation. A joint application within the Erasmus+ European Universities network had been submitted the previous day. The University of Gothenburg joined the network, consisting of Vrije Universiteit Brussel, the University of Ljubljana, l’Université Paris Seine, Pompeu Fabra University in Barcelona and the University of Warwick, during the autumn.
Our alliance will address global challenges, cooperating within research, innovation and increased mobility for both students and staff. This will be achieved by focusing on Europe 2050. Our network includes a number of clear common positions: The necessity of cooperation. The need to work regionally with industry and other players. And that our research and education must be shared with a wider audience by opening ourselves up to the world and not sitting in ivory towers.
In recognition of International Women’s Day on 8 March, it is also worth mentioning that gender equality and the work involved in achieving this often attract considerable international interest. There is a genuine interest in what we are doing within academia, and in gender equality in Sweden. This was therefore addressed during our meetings in the US, in Brussels and in the application to the commission.
Few have been able to evade the harsh criticism of the university’s research on dental implants and experiments on dogs in recent weeks. Employees involved with this work, and even others working in other areas, have been subjected to harsh criticism, hate and threats. Researchers and animal handlers, as well as managers and other employees in the core activities and support operations, have been affected. The university has received thousands of e-mails and comments on social media.
I would like to emphasise that I fully understand that animal testing may be perceived as controversial, arouses strong emotions and profoundly affects many people. Nor is this something that a responsible researcher can casually dismiss. A strict regulatory framework surrounds animal testing, and animal testing ethics committees process all applications. Researchers are working to reduce, refine and replace animal testing and always try to find alternative methods.
Reaching out with facts in the midst of a raging controversy is hard. A flood of arguments rooted in emotion drowns out arguments in this case that periodontal disease is a major public health issue, that the research has ethical permission and that the supervisory authority in this case confirms that we practice good animal husbandry.
At the same time, dialogue is important for us. In the current case, Sweden’s Animal Rights Alliance has always conducted its campaign in a democratic way and encouraged good behaviour. Animal rights organisations play an important role in questioning the use of animals in research. Patient organisations also have an important voice when it comes to the development of new pharmaceuticals and methods of treatment. Clearly it is difficult to reach a consensus on the issue.
Regarding our role as an employer, this massive criticism represents a working environment problem. I am aware that the situation has been very difficult for the most affected employees, who have been subjected to accusations and who daily have encountered inaccurate portrayals of their everyday lives, which they know is not consistent with reality.
This makes it particularly important for more of us to speak out in support of our activities, both when the wind is with us and against us.
We will never accept the threat of violence. Representatives from the Swedish Board of Agriculture sum this up well in an op-ed article in Göteborgs Posten (28 February 2019):
“In Sweden and in the European Union, we have democratically decided that animals may be used in research if this is done under strictly regulated norms. The research conducted must always be based on the needs of society and must never be controlled or limited by the threat of violence from criminal parties.”
In April the University of Gothenburg is hosting a broader dialogue about animal testing in research. I look forward to a democratic, perceptive and respectful dialogue.
Dödshot mot forskare på GU (Death threats against researchers at GU) (SVT 22 Feb)
Today our government revealed the new ministers and among them some new names were announced. Within the higher education area, we listened even more attentively when the new minister for Higher Education and Research was revealed. Helene Hellmark Knutsson (S) is stepping down and our new minister is called Matilda Ernkrans. Congratulations to an exciting position, Matilda!
We have a number of important issues to talk about, and my hope is that I and my colleagues have the opportunity to meet soon. You probably have a new commission waiting on your desk. We are of course very interested in how you and the new government will deal with the Control and Resources Commission (Strut). At the University of Gothenburg, we work knowingly to increase internationalisation and are eager to match the national strategy for internationalisation.
We work continuously with cooperation, research impact, and our role in society; at the same time questions about academic freedom are in focus. Certain research has been a weapon in the current debate and the discourse is getting more and more heated. Within the academia we want everybody to express themselves freely, we are always open to criticism, we like a good debate, and we are used to defending our case. But we also have to stand up for academic freedom, to secure a respectful discourse and we should never accept threats and hatred.
We’d like very much to talk about these issues with you. I want to take the opportunity to invite you to Gothenburg. You are very welcome to learn more about our university’s prerequisites, challenges and possibilities. Let’s take a fika and openly discuss matters such as open access, the possibilities of digitalisation, research infrastructures, widening participation, research ethics, teacher education attractiveness, equality, quality assessment systems …